Chicago-based The Boeing Company, an
aerospace giant that manufactures military aircraft and commercial
jetliners, has agreed to pay $380,000 and administer far-reaching
injunctive measures to settle two lawsuits brought by the U.S. Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
In one case, filed in 2005 (EEOC v. The Boeing Company,
05cv03034 PHX FJM), the EEOC brought sex discrimination and retaliation
claims against Boeing on behalf of two female engineers at Boeing’s
Mesa, Arizona facility. Antonia Castron complained of gender-based
harassment, including sexist remarks, creating a hostile environment
and, a few days later, she found herself transferred to a new unit that
did not suit her skill set. Less than two months after the transfer,
Boeing laid her off, purportedly because she could not perform as well
as other engineers in her new unit.
“Instead of stopping the harassment or reprimanding the men who
tormented me, they moved me to a unit that designed structures,” said
Castron. “I was skilled at electrical engineering. That’s like asking a
heart surgeon to do brain surgery. Then they evaluated me for layoff
based on my ability to perform structural work. They set me up for
layoff.”
The EEOC claimed that Boeing managers harbored discriminatory and
retaliatory motives when it transferred and terminated Castron.
Manufacturing engineer Renee Wrede twice complained of sex-based
harassment, and twice Boeing’s internal investigators substantiated her
complaints. Nonetheless, according to the EEOC, the company allowed her
harassers to influence her layoff evaluations and reduce her scores. As
a result, Wrede also received a layoff notice in October 2002. The
EEOC’s investigation showed that Boeing manipulated evaluation scores
used in its October 2002 reduction in force to justify the terminations
of Wrede and Castron.
“An employer is only setting itself up for more trouble when it
punishes a worker for exercising her right to complain about unlawful
activity in the workplace,” said EEOC Acting Chairman Stuart J.
Ishimaru. “The EEOC is always especially concerned when we uncover this
kind of unlawful retaliation. It chills witnesses and victims from
reporting illegal discrimination at work, and therefore interferes
dangerously with the Commission’s law enforcement efforts.”
In an earlier lawsuit (EEOC v. The Boeing Company,
CV-03-1210-PHX-PGR), the EEOC sought relief on behalf of Kelley Miles,
a female mechanic at the Mesa facility, who works on the Apache
helicopter that Boeing manufactures for the U.S. Army. The EEOC charged
that Boeing allowed Miles’ co-workers to harass her on an ongoing basis
due to her gender and allowed one or more managers to contribute to
that harassment without taking appropriate steps to address the
behavior. Much of the harassment directed at Miles was designed to make
it more difficult for her to perform her job, the EEOC said. Male
co-workers took Miles’ tools and either broke them, hid them, or
changed the adjustments before returning them. Other harassment was
sexual in nature. Miles reported this conduct to Boeing’s Human
Resources Department, but the company did nothing to address it. As a
result, the harassment continued.
The suit also charged that Boeing retaliated against Miles for
complaining about gender-based harassment. After Miles reported her
co-workers’ conduct to Boeing’s Human Resources Department, a manager
warned several of Miles’ co-workers to be careful of what they said to
her because the manager had them on a list.
Boeing’s alleged conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race,
color, religion, sex (including sexual harassment or pregnancy) or
national origin and protects employees who complain about such offenses
from retaliation.
The consent decrees reached between the parties provide for $380,000
in monetary relief for Castron, Wrede and Miles and an injunction
prohibiting future discrimination and retaliation. Further, the EEOC
obtained curative relief, such as training, to prevent Boeing from
engaging in any further discrimination and retaliation.