One of the largest apple producers in the United States has been
enjoined from interfering with workers involved in a federal lawsuit. Citing the “likelihood of irreparable harm” to
current and former employees of Eastern Washington-based Evans Fruit
Company, the chief judge of Eastern District of the federal district
court in Yakima ordered a preliminary injunction against the company
and its former general manager, Juan Marin, and held them accountable
for an “environment of intimidation.”
Marin’s sexual harassment of Evans Fruit employees is the central
allegation in the EEOC’s suit ( Case No. 10CV-03033 LRS in U.S.
District Court for the Eastern District of Washington) filed in June of
this year. At the time of filing, the federal agency also sought and
won a temporary restraining order against Evans Fruit and Marin for
threatening and retaliating against former and current employees who
assisted the EEOC in bringing the lawsuit. The court’s most recent
order, issued October 26, converts the temporary order into a
preliminary injunction, which extends the authority of the court’s
protection of Evans Fruit employees who want to assist the EEOC or
participate in the lawsuit through trial.
According to District Court Judge Lonny R. Suko, the EEOC clearly
showed the occurrence or threat of workers being “chilled” from coming
forward with claims relating to the agency’s suit. The court was
persuaded that as a former manager for over 36 years at Evans Fruit who
still retains a great deal of influence, Marin “has the means for
intimidating others” and that there was “a likelihood he would employ
those means for that purpose.” The court highlighted evidence that
Marin had sent two underlings to a local public library to report back
to him on Evans Fruit employees attending a meeting there in February
with EEOC attorneys.
The order’s sweeping provisions apply to Evans Fruit, its officers,
agents, managers, and employees, as well as Marin. The court has
prohibited any retaliatory measures against the EEOC’s class members,
witnesses, or family members, and any actions that would discourage
free association with those same people. It also enjoined Evans Fruit
from paying or offering to pay for favorable testimony in the EEOC’s
case. The court order prohibits negative actions against current Evans
Fruit employees who participate in legal proceedings or oppose unlawful
conduct.
“This is a major victory for workers who have been scared to
participate in our lawsuit,” said EEOC Regional Attorney William
Tamayo. “The court has ordered protections to ensure that individuals
can come forward without fear of reprisal.”
Tamayo urged workers who experienced sexual harassment at Evans
Fruit to contact the EEOC to determine if they qualify to be part of
the class: contact Carmen Flores at (206) 220-6853 or (832) 364-4190,
May Che at (206) 220-6919 or Debra Smith at (415) 310-4658 . (All speak
Spanish.)
Luis Lucero, director of the EEOC’s Seattle Field Office, commented
on the order’s unusually strong wording, “This sends a strong message
to employers and employees alike that retaliation will not be tolerated.
The EEOC filed suit against Evans Fruit seeking relief for three
individual charging parties and a class of women who were sexually
harassed at the grower’s Sunnyside ranch. According to the agency’s
investigation, the ranch manager Juan Marin and crew leaders often
singled out women (one who was 15 years old when the harassment
started) for sexual advances, with work assignments that isolated them
from friends and family members. The women were forced to quit, the
EEOC charged, in order to get away from the ongoing sexual comments,
propositioning and physical groping. Marin was terminated from the
company after 36 years of employment after the lawsuit was filed. One
of the harassment victims, represented by the Northwest Justice
Project, had intervened in the EEOC's lawsuit and named Marin as an
individual defendant along with Evans Fruit, his former employer.
According to company information, Evans Fruit Company operates 11
ranches, totaling over 7,000 acres and includes apple orchards and
three production facilities, and it employs 1,200 - 1,300 seasonal
employees in addition to regular staff.