The former and current owners of the Sahara Hotel &
Casino, a popular establishment on the Las Vegas strip, will pay a
total of $100,000 and furnish other relief to settle a national origin
harassment and retaliation lawsuit.
The EEOC originally filed suit against the former and current owners
of Sahara in July 2009 in U.S. District Court for the District of
Nevada (EEOC v. Gordon Gaming dba Sahara Hotel and Casino, Stockbridge / SBE Holdings dba Sahara Hotel and Casino,
Civil Action Case No. 2:09-cv-01356-PMP-RJJ) , alleging that the
harassment and retaliation violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964. According to the EEOC, the Sahara 's supervisors and coworkers
continuously belittled and harassed Ezzat Elias, whose job entailed
maintaining and delivering food to the hotel buffet, because of his
Egyptian heritage. The alleged harassers openly and continually
subjected Elias to derogatory comments, such as “Go back to Egypt,”
“f-----g Egyptian,” and often referred to him as “Bin Laden.” Elias
also endured graffiti in the men’s locker room and elsewhere, targeting
him with phrases such as “sand n----r” and “the Taliban must die.”
(Do you think that regular training could help? Training can help get these kinds of problems reported to the proper person and also can provide alternate persons to whom these issues can be reported.)
Despite Elias’s repeated complaints of such harassment, the EEOC
found that the Sahara’s management failed to take effective measures to
stop it. Instead, the EEOC said, supervisors retaliated against Elias
shortly after his initial complaint by increasing his workload,
subjecting him to closer scrutiny, formally disciplining and ultimately
suspending him.
The parties entered into a three-year consent decree which requires
the Sahara’s former and current owners to collectively pay $85,000 in
monetary relief to Elias. The hotel’s current owner will also pay an
additional $15,000 to the Nevada Equal Rights Commission (NERC), the
state entity charged with enforcing Nevada’s anti-discrimination laws,
for the purposes of education and outreach to the public on
anti-discrimination issues. Aside from the monetary relief, the current
owner also agreed to appoint an equal employment opportunity (EEO)
consultant and will review and revise its policies, training, and
procedures to ensure they effectively address workplace discrimination,
harassment and retaliation.